Saroj & Ors. Vs. Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Company & Ors. [Civil Appeal Nos.________ of 2024 arising out of SLP (C) Nos.

1. Ms. T. Archana, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, learned counsel for the respondent were heard ...

The appellant was the second appellant in Criminal Appeal No.1014 of 2014 which was partly allowed under the impugned ...

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh for respondent Nos. 1 ...

RC 7/E/2014 registered with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) (Bank Securities and Fraud Cell), Mumbai, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC and Section 13 ...

1 The review petition is allowed in terms of the signed order and the judgment dated 23 August 2022 is recalled. Civil Appeal No 5783 of 2022 shall stand restored to file for fresh adjudication before ...

11. In Usha Sinha vs. Dina Ram2 this Court held that the doctrine of lis pendens applies to an alienation during the pendency ...

2. The claimant, in a motor vehicle accident having suffered injuries, has filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation. He is aggrieved by the order 1 passed by the High Court 2. 3.

3. The appellant (original complainant) filed an application, under Section 156(3) CrPC, alleging that the second and third respondents (original accused) offered to take appellant's Truck (Trailor No ...

Dipankar Datta & Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ. 1. By way of the captioned defective review petition, the Petitioner seeks review of Judgment dated 28.08.2024 passed in Criminal Appeal No.3573 of 2024 ...

2. The present appeals challenge the final orders dated 4th July 2023 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in CRLMC No. 34 of 2022 and in CRLMC No. 33 of 2022, vide which the petition filed ...